YouTube Control Center Media Control Center brings a set of useful tools to YouTube.com
Support Development
PayPal ● Credit Card ● 
Bitcoin Address: bc1qzagj3ha4eyq2a6eunryggq9vy3wht93l3j0nyq
Lightning Address: webex@coinos.io
Your Input Matters
Review
Advertisement
Extension Screenshot
The "YouTube Control Center" is a lightweight, yet highly efficient extension for Firefox that controls various YouTube playback parameters in order to enhance your experience. The extension has two primary building blocks. First one is the control center panel. When a new YouTube music is streamed, different playback parameters can be controlled right from the panel without the need to switch to the actual YouTube tab. The second part of this extension is the controls that are injected in YouTube pages to change the UI and control volume, quality, and theme of the player.

Features

Window Server 2008 R2 _hot_ May 2026

Microsoft extended a lifeline via , selling annual patches at escalating prices (up to 400% of the license cost). This allowed critical systems to survive through 2023, but it was a painful, expensive bandage. The Security Headache: EternalBlue and Beyond The biggest stain on 2008 R2’s legacy came after its end-of-life. In 2017, the WannaCry ransomware attack exploited a vulnerability called EternalBlue (CVE-2017-0144). While Microsoft released an emergency patch for 2008 R2 (an exception to the ESU policy), the incident exposed the risk of running an OS whose core security model was designed in the late 2000s.

Launched in October 2009 alongside Windows 7 on the client side, 2008 R2 was more than a simple service pack; it was a fundamental shift. It was the last major Microsoft server OS to support 32-bit processors and the first to demand a 64-bit-only architecture. But beyond the technical specs, why did this OS become so beloved—and why is its end-of-life still causing IT managers headaches years later? Unlike its predecessor (Windows Server 2008, based on Windows Vista’s kernel), 2008 R2 was built on the Windows NT 6.1 kernel —the same rock-solid core that powered Windows 7. This meant immediate gains in stability, boot performance, and memory management. window server 2008 r2

After the sometimes-janky Windows Server 2003 and the resource-hungry 2008 (non-R2), 2008 R2 struck a perfect balance. It was stable enough to run critical SQL databases for a decade, secure enough to pass PCI audits, and lightweight enough to run on older (but 64-bit) hardware. The GUI was responsive, the event log was (relatively) readable, and the built-in backup tools were finally usable. Microsoft extended a lifeline via , selling annual

Matched Content

Preview

Reviews

Please keep reviews clean, avoid improper language, and do not post any personal information. Also, please consider sharing your valuable input on the official store.

What's new in this version

Version--
Published--/--/--
Change Logs:
    Last 10 commits on GitHub
    Hover over a node to see more details

    Need help?

    If you have questions about the extension, or ideas on how to improve it, please post them on the  support site. Don't forget to search through the bug reports first as most likely your question/bug report has already been reported or there is a workaround posted for it.

    Open IssuesIssuesForks

    Editorial Review

    Microsoft extended a lifeline via , selling annual patches at escalating prices (up to 400% of the license cost). This allowed critical systems to survive through 2023, but it was a painful, expensive bandage. The Security Headache: EternalBlue and Beyond The biggest stain on 2008 R2’s legacy came after its end-of-life. In 2017, the WannaCry ransomware attack exploited a vulnerability called EternalBlue (CVE-2017-0144). While Microsoft released an emergency patch for 2008 R2 (an exception to the ESU policy), the incident exposed the risk of running an OS whose core security model was designed in the late 2000s.

    Launched in October 2009 alongside Windows 7 on the client side, 2008 R2 was more than a simple service pack; it was a fundamental shift. It was the last major Microsoft server OS to support 32-bit processors and the first to demand a 64-bit-only architecture. But beyond the technical specs, why did this OS become so beloved—and why is its end-of-life still causing IT managers headaches years later? Unlike its predecessor (Windows Server 2008, based on Windows Vista’s kernel), 2008 R2 was built on the Windows NT 6.1 kernel —the same rock-solid core that powered Windows 7. This meant immediate gains in stability, boot performance, and memory management.

    After the sometimes-janky Windows Server 2003 and the resource-hungry 2008 (non-R2), 2008 R2 struck a perfect balance. It was stable enough to run critical SQL databases for a decade, secure enough to pass PCI audits, and lightweight enough to run on older (but 64-bit) hardware. The GUI was responsive, the event log was (relatively) readable, and the built-in backup tools were finally usable.

    Recent Blog Posts